The philosophical content of the definition of the national mentality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.03.30.04

Keywords:

mentality, ethnicity, ethnocultural, social philosophy, terminology

Abstract

The notion of national mentality is widely used in sociophilosophical and related discussions concerned with the conjunction of the categories of cultural and mental, but its definitions and operationalization often remain implicit. The research goal of the presented article is to reconstruct the proximal philosophical content of the term national mentality. The following research questions are raised: the extensiveness and exhaustiveness of current definitions presented in publications; the influence of contexts of use of the term on its definition; the coherence of aspects of definitions of mentality by different definitions. The methodology of the work is represented by theoretical modeling. It involves critical and comparative analysis of secondary and primary sources. The article conceptualizes the categories that highlight the issues of national mentality. The results emphasize the limitations of current definitions and the insufficient differential capacity of a one-dimensional definition, given the complexity of the phenomenon's structure. The article highlights the dynamics of the concept's development and contextual conditionality, which is considered as a prerequisite for the crisis of our time. The role of individual agency and ways of transforming national codes are emphasized. The author characterizes the etymology and genesis of the concept as a consequence of imperialist influences on European philosophical schools. A combination of empirical-based discrete and holistic continuous dimensional approaches is proposed, using the primitives of the level structure of mentality. The provided detail is offered as an alternative to the traditional understanding of national mentality as a single mental reality. Implications. These results serve as the basis for the restoration of the cognitive process of the national mentality in the Ukrainian philosophical tradition, in accordance with the standards of empirical-based research. The proposed way of understanding the relationship between culture and psyche allows the term to be used in studies of related fields that do not have a descriptive category to denote the ways of being of an ethno-cultural community. By providing a more nuanced and precise understanding of the subject, these categories can help counteract culturally based simplifications that threaten to segregate and exclude. The principles of national mentality conceptualization outlined above are necessary for the correct implementation of the results obtained in practice. In fact, interventions aimed at the thinking aspect of society, such as pedagogical, political, or managerial, should be based on a substantial philosophical foundation.

References

Vlasevych, T. (2011). Mentality as an initial dimension of the folk worldview. Bulletin of Lviv University. Series: philosophical and political studies, 1. 56–65.

Hanusyn, O. (2022). History of everyday life as an acute area of research. In n.d., All-Ukrainian scientific and practical conference “Actual issues of development of social sciences in the XXI century” (p. 9). Lviv Polytechnic National University.

Hordiichuk O. (2018). The Main Determinants of the Transformation of Ukrainian Mentality in the 20-90s of the Twentieth Century. Scientific Bulletin of Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, 10(383). 49–54. http://evnuir.vnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/17669.

Hordiichuk O. (2018). Archetypes of Ukrainian mentality: socio-philosophical analysis. Bulletin of Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University. Philosophical sciences, (1 (84)), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.35433/PhilosophicalSciences.1(84).2018.15-19.

Hordiichuk O. (2019b). Terminological Problems of the Concept of Mentality in Socio-Philosophical Discourse. Bulletin of Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University. Philosophical sciences, (86), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.35433/PhilosophicalSciences.2(86).2019.39-50.

Danyliuk, I., Kurapov, A., & Yahiiaiev, I. (2019). Ethno-cultural psychology: history and modernity. Publishing house.

Kobko-Odarii, V. (2021). The Structure of Legal Mentality. Historical and legal journal, 17(2), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.32782/2409-4544/2021-2/2.

Korytska, A. (2021). Mentality and mentality in contemporary scientific discourse. In E. Pluzhnik, A. Liubchych & L. Polyvana (Eds.), The XV International Science Conference «Trends in the development of practice and science» (p. 242). International Science Group. https://doi.org/10.46299/ISG.2021.II.SV.

Krymskyi, S. & Zablotskyi, V. (2002). Mentality. In V. Shynkaruk (Ed.), Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. New York.

Lozova, O. (2006). Psychosemantics of Ethnic Consciousness: Problems and Development Trends. Scientific Bulletin of the UNESCO Chair, 12. 162–168. https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/5067.

Poplavska, T. (1995). The genesis of personality mentality in national culture [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. South Ukrainian Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynskyi.

Tymosh, Yu. (2016). Psychosemantic features of moral consciousness of a personality: theoretical aspects. Collection of scientific works “Problems of modern psychology", 33. 532–542. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2016-33.%p.

Charkina, T. I. (2019). Methodological approaches to the study of mentality. Bulletin of HNPU named after H.S. Skovoroda “Philosophy ", 44, 108–118.

Anik, E., West, R., Cardno, A., & Mir, G. (2021). Culturally adapted psychotherapies for depressed adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of affective disorders, 278, 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.051.

Gaisser, J. (2008). The Fortunes of Apuleius and the Golden Ass: A Study in Transmission and Reception. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1j666kh.

Baltadzhy, P., & Matvieieva, L. (2019). The Category of" Mentality" in Contemporary Scientific Discourse. Fundamental and applied researches in practice of leading scientific schools, 34(4), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.33531/farplss.2019.4.10.

Bilewicz, M., & Liu, J. (2020). Collective victimhood as a form of adaptation: A world-systems perspective. In J. R. Vollhardt (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 120–140). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190875190.003.0006.

Bocheliuk, V., Nechyporenko, V., Pozdniakova, O., Siliavina, Y., & Kyrbiatiev, O. (2020). Culture and Mentality-Related Specifics of Implementation of the'Law on Counteracting Bullying'in the Environment of Educational Institutions. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 11(3 (49)), 755–760. https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v11.3(49).07.

Bortnyk, N., Zharovska, I., Panfilova, T., Lisna, I., & Valetska, O. (2021). Judicial Practice of Protecting Human Rights: Problems of the Rule of Law in a Postmodern Society. Postmodern Openings, 12(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1/248.

Cash, J. (2020). Psychoanalysis, cultures of anarchy, and ontological insecurity. International theory, 12(2), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000147.

Cicero, M. (1913). De Officiis. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_officiis.1913.

Comte, A. (2009). A General View of Positivism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511692888.

Danyliuk, I., & Yahiyayev, I. (2019). VA Romenets’ school of creative abilities education: the origins of success. Psychology & society (Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo), 75(1), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2019.01.116.

Daryanto, A., & Song, Z. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relationship between place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 123, 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.045.

De Vaan, M. (2018). Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages (7th ed.). Leiden.

Dewalque, A. (2020). The Phenomenology of Mentality. In Fisette, D., Fréchette, G., Janoušek, H. (Eds.), Franz Brentano’s Philosophy After One Hundred Years. Primary Sources in Phenomenology (pp. 23–40). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48563-4_2.

Emerson, R., Carr, J. & Myerson, J. (2010). Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson: Letters and Social Aims. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674053786.

Fisogni, P. (2021). Psychic Energy before Psyche: Resilience and Void in Ancient Egypt. Clinical Research in Psychology, 4(1). 14–19. https://doi.org/10.33309/2639-9113.040103.

Gilbert, P. (2021). Evolutionary functional analysis: The study of social mentalities, social rank and caring-compassion. In J. N. Kirby & P. Gilbert (Eds.), Making an impact on mental health: The applications of psychological research (pp. 4–42). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244551.

Hegel, G. (2012). Phanomenologie des Geistes. Suhrkamp Verlag.

Hordiichuk, O. (2019a). Mentalność ukraińska a polska: cechy wspólne i różniące. Ukrainian Polonistics, 16(2019), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.35433/2220-4555.16.2019.phyl-1.

Hordiichuk, O. (2020). The Formation and Transformation of Poles’ Mentality after 1989: An Analysis from the Perspective of Social Philosophy. Konteksty Społeczne, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.17951/ks.2020.8.1.24-47.

Husa, J. (2019). Constitutional Mentality. In: Letto-Vanamo, P., Tamm, D., Gram Mortensen, B.O. (Eds.), Nordic Law in European Context. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice (pp. 41–60). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03006-3_3.

Karkov, N., & Valiavicharska, Z. (2018). Rethinking East-European socialism: Notes toward an anti-capitalist decolonial methodology. Interventions, 20(6), 785–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2018.1515647.

Kim, B., Seo, C., & Hong, Y. O. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of income inequality and crime in Europe: Do places matter?. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28. 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09450-7.

Korolyov, I., & Domylivska, L. (2020). Mentality and National Character as Semiotic Regulators of Communicative Behavior. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(1), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i1.2355.

Kostyuk, L. (2008). Phylogenetic patterns of development of ethnic mentality of Ukrainians [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.

Kryvyzyuk, L., Levyk, B., Khrypko, S., & Ishchuk, A. (2021). The Phenomenon of National Security within Postmodern Cultures: Interests, Values, Mentality. Postmodern Openings, 12(3), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.3/328.

Levyk, B., Aleksandrova, O., Khrypko, S., & Iatsenko, G. (2020). Geo-policy and Geo-psychology as Cultural Determinants of Ukrainian Religion, Mentality and National Security. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(3), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i3.2761.

Malabou, C. (2017). The Brain of History, or, the Mentality of the Anthropocene. South Atlantic Quarterly, 116(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3749304.

Moscovici, S. (2020). Reflections on the popularity of ‘Conspiracy Mentalities’. International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1). 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.432.

Ozturk, A. (2021). Religion, identity and power: Turkey and the Balkans in the twenty-first century. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474474689.001.0001.

Piroddi, C. (2021). Pathologies of society and social philosophy: new perspectives from Finland. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 22(1). 60–82. https://doi.org/60-82.10.1080/1600910X.2020.1779770.

Plato, F. & Platt, J. (2008). The Dialogues of Plato, Volume 1. New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300158816.

Ponomarenko, L. (2020). Mentality of Ukrainian society and its impact on modern processes of institutionalization (archetypal approach). Public management, 1(21), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2020-1(21)-252-263.

Qian, K., & Yahara, T. (2020). Mentality and behavior in COVID-19 emergency status in Japan: Influence of personality, morality and ideology. PloS one, 15(7), e0235883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235883.

Sherali, O. (2021). Study of ethnopsychological basis of personal characteristics in perception of advertising. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 11(10), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7315.2021.00080.0.

Spengler, O. (2017). Der Untergang des Abendlandes. C.H.BECK. https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406693410.

Dinzelbacher, P. (1993). Europäische Mentalitätsgeschichte. Hauptthemen in Einzeldarstellungen, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.11588/fr.1996.2.60046.

Tulenkov, M., Gugnin, E., Shtepa, S., Patynok, O., & Lipin, M. (2021). Mentality as Category of Social Philosophy in the Post-Pandemic Society. Postmodern Openings, 12(1Sup1), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1Sup1/292.

Wang, J., Cheng, G., Chen, T., & Leung, K. (2019). Team creativity/innovation in culturally diverse teams: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(6), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2362.

Yang, Y. (2019). Theoretical Framework for Studying Social Mentality. In Yang, Y. (Eds.) Social Mentality in Contemporary China. Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path (pp. 1–14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7812-6_1.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-30

How to Cite

Yatsenko, N. (2022). The philosophical content of the definition of the national mentality. Futurity Philosophy, 1(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.03.30.04