Philosophical and educational traditions of the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.03.30.01Keywords:
philosophy of education, educational strategies, axiology of education, education of the future, philosophical and synergistic dimensions of education, innovative education, educational traditionsAbstract
Aims: The purpose of the research is to highlight the philosophical dichotomy of traditional and innovative ways of building educational strategies. Philosophy is designed to highlight the positive and negative aspects of the educational paradigm. In contrast to the educational understanding, philosophical analysis is in constant search of optimising the strategy of educational progress. The difference between educational and philosophical-educational approaches lies in the scale of theoretical and methodological understanding and practical implementation of projects in the education system. While the education is focused on achieving results in real-time or in the short term, the philosophy offers strategic guidelines for the development of education in the context of global socio-cultural development. In this context, the aim of the study is to highlight the axiological aspects of the philosophy of education of the future. Methodology: The methodological basis was a combination of general scientific, pedagogical, and philosophical methods. In order to achieve the set goals, two main methodological approaches of the modern scientific and philosophical paradigm were used: dialectical and synergistic. By contrasting the fundamentality and dynamism of the functioning of the educational system, the realisation of the prospects of the model of educational development is achieved. Results: The results of the study indicate that the synergistic interaction of traditions and innovations ensures the stability of the educational system and the ability to progress in the context of civilizational progress. In the modern scientific and ideological paradigm, there is a balance of traditional and innovative dimensions, but the dynamism of modern civilizational development can ensure the process of the dominance of the innovative component associated with the functioning of information and digital technologies. Scientific Novelty: The scientific novelty of the study is an attempt to determine the priority format of interaction between the traditional and innovative components of the educational system. The philosophy is intended to complement the scientific and pedagogical and organisational and educational clusters of this interaction by providing value guidelines for the educational space. Conclusion: Any educational activity is correlated within the educational system (demand, expediency, effectiveness) and is consistent with the worldview principles of the modern worldview. Thanks to philosophical and educational guidelines of an axiological nature, the status of traditions and innovations in education is balanced.
References
Bell, R., & Bell, H. (2020). Applying educational theory to develop a framework to support the delivery of experiential entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(6), 987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2020-0012
Biesta, G. (2019). How General Can Bildung Be? Reflections on the Future of a Modern Educational Ideal. In Biesta, G. (Ed.), Obstinate Education. Leiden, Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004401105_003
Biesta, G. (2020). Risking Ourselves in Education: Qualification, Socialization, and Subjectification Revisited. Educational Theory, 70, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411
Biesta, G. (2021). World-centered Education: A View for the Present. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003098331
Borba, M. C. (2021). The future of mathematics education since COVID-19: humans-with-media or humans-with-non-living-things. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108, 385–400. https:/ /doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10043-2
Bozkurt, A. (2019). From Distance Education to Open and Distance Learning: A Holistic Evaluation of History, Definitions, and Theories. In Sisman-Ugur, S. & Kurubacak, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism (pp. 252–273). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8431-5.ch016
Buchanan, R. A., Forster, D. J., Douglas, S., Nakar, S., Boon, H. J., Heath, T., Heyward, P., D’Olimpio, L., Ailwood, J., Eacott, S., Smith, S., Peters, M., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Exploring new ways of teaching and doing ethics in education in the 21st century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1178–1197, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1880387
Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & Searsmith, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(12), 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732
DePryck, K. (2019). E-Ducational Philosophy: Who’s afraid of falling off a flat E-Arth? In Carliner, S. (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 931–934). New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/212805/
Dewey, J. (2021). Pragmatic America. In Weber, E. (Ed.), America's Public Philosopher: Essays on Social Justice, Economics, Education, and the Future of Democracy (pp. 49–54). New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/dewe19894-009
Ehlers, U. D., & Kellermann, S. A. (2019). Future Skills: The future of learning and higher education. Karlsruhe. Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208249/
Ergas, O. (2019). Mindfulness In, As and Of Education: Three Roles of Mindfulness in Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 53(2), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12349
Facer, K. (2019). Storytelling in troubled times: what is the role for educators in the deep crises of the 21st century? Literacy, 53, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12176
Fuller, S., & Jandrić, P. (2019). The Postdigital Human: Making the History of the Future. Postdigital Science Education, 1, 190–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0003-x
García Soto, L. (2021). Philosophy and Teaching. Critical Hermeneutics, 365–386. https://doi.org/10.13125/CH/4755
Gökçe Narin, N. (2021). A Content Analysis of the Metaverse Articles . Journal of Metaverse, 1(1), 17–24. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jmv/issue/67581/1051382
Hagg, G., & Gabrielsson, J. (2020). A systematic literature review of the evolution of pedagogy in entrepreneurial education research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 829–861. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0272
Hagg, G., & Kurczewska, A. (2021). Toward a Learning Philosophy Based on Experience in Entrepreneurship Education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419840607
Hu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and After Covid-19: Immediate Responses and Long-Term Visions. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3
Hughes, C. (2020). Addressing violence in education: From policy to practice. Prospects, 48, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-019-09445-1
Jandric, P., & Knox, J. (2022). The postdigital turn: Philosophy, education, research. Policy Futures in Education, 20(7), 780–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211062713
Kopnina, H. (2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1710444
Longo, F., Padovano, A., & Umbrello, S. (2020). Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future. Applied Sciences, 10(12), 4182. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124182
Maksymchuk, B., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., Davydenko, H., Soichuk, R., Khurtenko, O., Groshovenko, O., Stepanchenko, N., Andriychuk, Y., Grygorenko, T., Duka, T., Pidlypniak, I., Gurevych, R., Kuzmenko, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2020). Developing Healthcare Competency in Future Teachers. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/307
Mangez, E., & Vanden Broeck, P. (2020). The history of the future and the shifting forms of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(6), 676–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1708329
Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Navarro-Tuch, S., Bustamante-Bello, M. R., Rosas-Fernández, J. B., & Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278
Morris, T. H. (2019). Self-directed learning: A fundamental competence in a rapidly changing world. International Review of Education, 65, 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09793-2
Nóvoa, A., & Alvim, Y. (2020). Nothing is new, but everything has changed: A viewpoint on the future school. Prospects, 49, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09487-w
Olssen, M. (2020). Globalisation, Neoliberalism and Laissez-Faire: The Retreat from Naturalism. In Zajda, J. (Eds.), Globalisation, Ideology and Neo-Liberal Higher Education Reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research (pp 121–140). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1751-7_8
Ortiz-Revilla, J., Adúriz-Bravo, A., & Greca, I. M. (2020). A Framework for Epistemological Discussion on Integrated STEM Education. Science & Education, 29, 857–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00131-9
Peters, M. A., Besley, T. (2019). Critical Philosophy of the Postdigital. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0004-9
Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2019). The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376
Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2022). Biodigital Philosophy, Technological Convergence, and Postdigital Knowledge Ecologies. In Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., Hayes, S. (Eds.), Bioinformational Philosophy and Postdigital Knowledge Ecologies. Postdigital Science and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95006-4_1
Peters, M. A., McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2022). A viral theory of post-truth. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(6), 698–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1750090
Pihkala, P. (2020). Eco-Anxiety and Environmental Education. Sustainability, 12(23), 10149. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310149
Pikkarainen, E. (2021). Education, Consciousness and Negative Feedback: Towards the Renewal of Modern Philosophy of Education. Philosophies, 6(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6020025
Ponce, O. A., Pagán-Maldonado, N., & Galán, J. G. (2020). Philosophy of Educational Research: New Epistemological, Methodological and Historical Approach. International Journal of Educational Excellence, 6(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.18562/IJEE.058
Qureshi, M. I., Khan, N., Raza, D., Imran, A., & Ismail, F. (2021). Digital Technologies in Education 4.0. Does it Enhance the Effectiveness of Learning? A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 15(31). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i04.20291
Ratten, V., & Usmanij, P. (2021). Entrepreneurship education: Time for a change in research direction? Entrepreneurship education: Time for a change in research direction? The International Journal of Management Education, 1, 100367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100367
Schiff, D. (2021). Out of the laboratory and into the classroom: the future of artificial intelligence in education. AI & SOCIETY, 36, 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01033-8
Stein, S., Andreotti, V., Suša, R., Ahenakew, C., & Čajková, T. (2022). From education for sustainable development to education for the end of the world as we know it. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1835646
Stolz, S. (2020). Phenomenology and phenomenography in educational research: A critique. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(10), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1724088
Turdiyev, B. (2021). Philosophical Dialectics of National and Universal Cultural Development. Irish Interdisciplinary Journal of Science & Research (IIJSR). Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3918346
Turner, D. (2020). Globalisation and Neo-liberal Higher Education Reforms. In Zajda, J. (Eds.), Globalisation, Ideology and Neo-Liberal Higher Education Reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research (pp 141–149). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1751-7_9
Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific Literacy and Social Transformation. Science & Education, 30, 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2
Varpio, L., & MacLeod, A. (2020). Philosophy of Science Series: Harnessing the Multidisciplinary Edge Effect by Exploring Paradigms, Ontologies, Epistemologies, Axiologies, and Methodologies. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 686–689. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003142
Vlieghe, J., Zamojski, P. (2019). Immanence and Transcendence in Education. In Vlieghe, J., Zamojski, P. (Eds.), Towards an Ontology of Teaching . Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education (pp 63–78). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16003-6_5
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
Zajda, J., & Rust, V. (2020). Current Research Trends in Globalisation and Neo-Liberalism in Higher Education. In Zajda, J. (Eds.), Globalisation, Ideology and Neo-Liberal Higher Education Reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research (pp 1–9). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1751-7_1
Zawacki-Richter, O., Conrad, D., Bozkurt, A., Aydin, C., Bedenlier, S., Jung, I., Stöter, J., Veletsianos, G., Blaschke, L., Bond, M., Broens, A., Bruhn, E., Dolch, C., Kalz, M., Kondakci, Y., Marin, V., Mayrberger, K., Müskens, W., Naidu, S., Qayyum, A., Roberts, J., Sangrà, A., Loglo, F., Slagter van Tryon, P., Xiao,
J., & Kerres, M. (2020). Elements of Open Education: An Invitation to Future Research. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4659
Zidny, R., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2020). A Multi-Perspective Reflection on How Indigenous Knowledge and Related Ideas Can Improve Science Education for Sustainability. Science & Education, 29, 145–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00100-x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
