Philosophy of the Future in the Context of Scientific and Pedagogical Workers Training and Artificial Intelligence Application
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2023.03.30.04Keywords:
artificial intelligence, scientific and pedagogical workers, model, scenario, future, educationAbstract
The article is aimed to introduce a conceptual and categorical framework of the future, to analyse the philosophical fundamentals of scientific and pedagogical workers training and artificial intelligence application, and to reveal applicable scenarios of establishment of efficient training in future in the context of application of artificial intelligence. Methodology: To conduct the research thoroughly we used mixed methodology. A scientific literature review was used in order to establish the theoretical basics of the investigation, to clarify the relevant ideas, and to develop the research methodology. During the investigation the most recent 41 papers devoted to the philosophy of future-focused education and application of artificial intelligence were selected to describe the problem accurately. To collect data the questionnaires, surveys and online data acquisition were applied. The research included three stages and lasted during September, 2021 – May, 2023. The research involved 119 scientific and pedagogical workers from institutions of higher education including instructors, post-graduate students and undergraduates. Results: The research interpreted the category artificial intelligence from the philosophical perspective, described the applications of artificial intelligence in the process of training of scientific and pedagogical workers at the institutions of higher education, and elaborated the model of artificial intelligence application while training scientific and pedagogical workers. Also, four future-focused scenarios to implement the model were outlined. Scientific Novelty: The study initially represents a unique perspective of philosophical interpretation of the future. Also, it brings original ideas to design the model of artificial intelligence application while training scientific and pedagogical workers that has not been done before. Conclusion: The model can be used for the improvement of scientific and pedagogical workers training at the institutions of higher education and prepare them to future transformation within the educational environment.
References
Al Husaeni, D., & Munir, M. (2023). Literature Review and Bibliometric Mapping Analysis: Philosophy of Science and Technology Education. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijomr.v3i2.56242
Alemdar, M., & Aytaç, A. (2022). The impact of teachers’ educational philosophy tendencies on their curriculum autonomy. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(1), 270–284. https://dx.doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2022.166
Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Humaidi, A.J., Al-Dujaili, A., Duan, Y., Al-Shamma, O., … Farhan L. (2021). Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions. Journal of Big Data, 8, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8
Bagheri Noaparast, K. (2022). Challenges Facing the Philosophy of Education in the Twenty-First Century. In Alpaydın, Y., Demirli, C. (eds) Educational Theory in the 21st Century. Maarif Global Education Series (pp. 3–23). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9640-4_1
Baykasoğlu, A., Özbel, B. K., Dudaklı, N., Subulan, K., & Şenol, M. E. (2018). Process mining based approach to performance evaluation in computer-aided examinations. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 1841–1861. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21971
Bonino, G., Maffezioli, P., Petrovich, E., & Tripodi, P. (2022). When philosophy (of science) meets formal methods: a citation analysis of early approaches between research fields. Synthese, 200, 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03484-6
Bussmann, B., & Kötter, M. (2018). Between scientism and relativism: epistemic competence as an important aim in science and philosophy education. Research in Subject-matter Teaching and Learning (RISTAL), 1(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.23770/rt1819
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dafermos, M. (2018). Relating dialogue and dialectics: a philosophical perspective. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 6. doi: 10.5195/dpj.2018.189
Dever, D. A., Azevedo, R., Cloude, E. B., & Wiedbusch, M. (2020). The impact of autonomy and types of informational text presentations in game-based environments on learning: Converging multi-channel processes data and learning outcomes. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(4), 581–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00215-1
Gao, Y. (2023). The Problems of “Artificial Intelligence” in Modern Philosophy and Science. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 3(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v3i2.7692
Garg, M., & Tamanna (2022). Global Impact of Russia-Ukraine War on Education Sector. International Research Journal of Commerce Arts and Science, 13(11), 164–168. http://www.casirj.com/
Gray, S. L., & Kucirkova, N. (2021). AI and the human in education: Editorial. London Review of Education, 19(1). DOI: 10.14324/LRE.19.1.10
Gupta, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). Supporting inclusive learning using chatbots? A chatbot-led interview study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 33(1), 98–108. https://jise.org/Volume33/n1/JISE2022v33n1pp98-108.pdf
Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3), 206–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0077
Korinek, A., Schindler, M., & Stiglitz, J. (2021). Technological Progress, Artificial Intelligence, and Inclusive Growth. IMF Working Papers, 2021(166). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513583280.001
Kurylo, V., Karaman, O., & Kurylo, N. (2023). Pedagogical Philosophy as a New Independent Scientific Theory. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 15(1), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.1/693
Lerner, R. M., & Bornstein, M. H. (2021). Contributions of the specificity principle to theory, research, and application in the study of human development: A view of the issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 75, 101294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101294
Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790.
Menéndez-Alvarez-Hevia, D., Urbina-Ramírez, S., Forteza-Forteza, D., & Rodríguez-Martín, A. (2022). Contributions of futures studies to education: A systematic review. Comunicar, 73(30), https://doi.org/10.3916/C73-2022-01
Moser, M., Homan, Yu., Shaparenko, Kh., Kovalenko, O., & Tishechkina K. (2021). Historical and Philosophical Approach to Teaching Disciplines in High School. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 11(1), 51–59. http://repository.sspu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/10396
Nasrollahi, Z., Eskandari, N., Adaryani, M. R., & Tasuji, M. H. H. R. (2020). Spirituality and effective factors in education: A qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 9(52). DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_430_19
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011–2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Ozen, Y. (2023). Scientificity of Psychology in the Context of Science Philosophy. Journal of Education, Teaching and Social Studies, 5(2), 61–67. DOI:10.22158/jetss.v5n2p61
Pisica, A. I., Edu, T., Zaharia, R. M., & Zaharia, R. (2023). Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Pros and Cons from the Perspectives of Academics. Societies, 13, 118. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/soc13050118
Poshka, A. (2019). EFL Frameworks for culture teaching and cultural relativism. KNOWLEDGE - International Journal, 31(2), 567–570. https://doi.org/10.35120/kij3102567p
Rostoka, M., Guraliuk, A., Cherevychnyi, G., Vyhovska, O., Poprotskyi, I., & Terentieva, N. (2021). Philosophy of a Transdisciplinary Approach in Designing an Open Information and Educational Environment of Institutions of Higher Education. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(3), 548-567. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.3/466
Salas-Pilco, S., & Yang, Y. (2022). Artificial Intelligence application in Latin America higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(21), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-022-00326-w
Sarker, I. H. Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Overview on Techniques, Taxonomy, Applications and Research Directions. SN Computer Science, 2, 420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00815-1
Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, 57, 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12532
Shukla, A. K., Janmaijaya, M., Abraham, A., & Muhuri, P. K. (2019). Engineering applications of artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis of 30 years (1988–2018). Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.010
Su, Q., & He, Y. (2021). The Dialectical Development that The Conception of Nature in Philosophy of Education: from Comenius, Rousseau to Dewe. Journal of Modern Education, 2, 43–56. http://xdjylc.scnu.edu.cn/en/article/id/8fd24bf5-4ceb-41f3-be20-c7f560db39af
Tauginienė, L., Gaižauskaitė, I., Razi, S., Glendinning, I., Sivasubramaniam, S., Marino, F., … Kravjar, J. (2019). Enhancing the Taxonomies Relating to Academic Integrity and Misconduct. Journal of Academic Ethics, 17, 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09342-4
Tesar, M. (2021). Future Studies: Reimagining our Educational Futures in the Post-Covid-19 world Technology. Policy Futures in Education, 19(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1478210320986950
Tomé, J. M. S. (2022). Humanization in educational environments: Aspects necessary for living in school today. South Florida Journal of Development, 3(6), 6897–6902. DOI: 10.46932/sfjdv3n6-039
Tuomi, I. (2018). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Learning, Teaching, and Education. Policies for the future. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI:10.2760/12297
Virmajoki, V. (2022). Limits of conceivability in the study of the future. Lessons from philosophy of science. Futures, 142, 102993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.102993
Wang, J. (2021). Is artificial intelligence capable of understanding? An analysis based on philosophical hermeneutics. Cultures of Science, 4(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083211056405
White, J. (2020). Education in an uncertain future: Two scenarios. London Review of Education, 18(2), 299–312. DOI: 10.14324/LRE.18.2.11
Wong, C. (2018). Sequence Based Course Recommender for Personalized Curriculum Planning. In Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 531–534). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93846-2_100
Youheng, Z. (2023). A Historical Review and Philosophical Examination of the two Paradigms in Artificial Intelligence Research. European Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 2(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejai.2023.2.2.23
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
