The philosophy of the newest development strategy in the public management in Poland: analysis of concepts and results of implementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.12.30.01Keywords:
philosophy of management, management, management strategies, public leadership, institutional management, the functionality of the public sectorAbstract
Aims: The purpose of the research is to provide a philosophical justification for institutional and functional innovations in the public administration sector of Poland in the context of the balance of nationally authentic and globally European administrative and managerial development. The objectives of the research are focused on the transformation of traditional managerial strategies interpretation to an innovative public administration paradigm in terms of two socio-philosophical dimensions: the format (the work of the governing sector transition to information technology dominance) and the content (the adherence to democratic guidelines in the interaction of government, business, and citizens). Methodology: To achieve the goal and objectives of the study, both the classical methodological arsenal of general scientific methods (mainly rationalistic and analytical) and innovative methodological approaches of a synergistic type, namely the self-organisation and the interdisciplinarity, are used. Results: The results of the study identified the following priority vectors of development of the public administration sector in Poland as a member state of the European Union: in the institutional cluster - democracy and rule of law; in the functionality segment - pragmatism and innovation. The governance sector in a developed country is designed to provide such targeted socio-cultural elements as accessibility, equality, unity, diversity, and authenticity. The tools for achieving a high level of social development in the modern philosophical and worldview picture of the world are: digitalisation, communication, technologisation, and pragmatisation of the management process. Scientific Novelty: The scientific novelty of the study focuses on the correlation of traditional and innovative characteristics of management strategies in the developing countries in the socio-political, socio-economic, and cultural aspects (on the example of the case of the public administration sector in Poland). Conclusion: The maintenance of a balance between the normative and regulatory components of the state administrative structure and creative and innovative individual elements contributes to the formation of a holistic paradigm of civil society that acts as a guarantor of compliance with humanistic and value-based guidelines in the process of the community socio-cultural development (local or global).
References
Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, I. (2022). Public administration digitalization and corruption in the eu member states. A comparative and correlative research analysis. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 65, E/2022, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.65E.1
Androniceanu, A., Kinnunen, J., & Georgescu, I. (2020). E-Government clusters in the EU based on the Gaussian Mixture Models. Administratie si Management Public, 35, 6–20. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2020.35-01
Bombiak, E. (2020). Advances in the implementation of the model of sustainable human resource managment: polish companies experiences. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7, 1667–1687. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(16)
Bonet, L., & Zamorano, M. M. (2021). Cultural policies in illiberal democracies: a conceptual framework based on the Polish and Hungarian governing experiences. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(5), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2020.1806829
Dźwigoł, H., Trushkina, N., & Kwilinski, A. (2021). The Organizational and Economic Mechanism of Implementing the Concept of Green Logistics. Virtual Economics, 2, 41–75. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2021.04.02(3)
Domańska-Szaruga, B. (2020). Maturity of risk management culture. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2060–2078. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(41)
Dudek, M., & Wrzochalska, A. (2019). Between Competitiveness and Sustainability? Achievements and Dilemmas of Regional Policy in the Context of Economic Development of Rural Regions: the Case of Poland. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(2), 299. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n2p299
Farelnik, E. (2020). Cooperation of slow cities as an opportunity for the development: an example of Polish National Cittaslow Network. Oeconomia Copernicana, 11(2), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020
Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. Research Policy, 51(1), 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390
Gomes de Sousa, W., Pereira de Melo, E., De Souza Bermejo, P. E., Araújo Sousa Farias, R., & Oliveira Gomes, A. (2019). How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004
Gorzelany, J., Gorzelany-Dziadkowiec, M., Luty, L., Firlej, K., Gaisch, M., Dudziak, O., & Scott, C. (2021). Finding links between organisation’s culture and innovation. The impact of organisational culture on university innovativeness, PLoS ONE, 16(10), e0257962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257962
Jakimowicz, A., & Rzeczkowski, D. (2019). Diversification of innovation strategies of Polish industrial processing enterprises depending on their size after the global financial crisis. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 4, 35–76. https://doi.org/10.7341/20191542
Kafel, T., Wodecka-Hyjek, A., & Kusa, R. (2021). Multidimensional public sector organizations' digital maturity model. Administratie si Management Public, 37, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2021.37-02
Karpińska, A., & Croissant, J. (2020). Innovation and science dilemmas. Unintended consequences of innovation policy for science. Polish experience. Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1718055
Kempa, J., & Kozłowski, A.(2020). Participatory Budget as a Tool Supporting the Development of Civil Society in Poland. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 13(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-0003
Kowalska, M. (2020). SME Managers’ Perceptions of Sustainable Marketing Mix in Different Socioeconomic Conditions—A Comparative Analysis of Sri Lanka and Poland. Sustainability, 12(24), 10659. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410659
Kravariti, F., & Johnston, K. (2020). Talent management: a critical literature review and research agenda for public sector human resource management. Public Management Review, 22(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1638439
Kumar, S., Suhaib, M., & Asjad, M. (2020). INDUSTRY 4.0: complex, disruptive, but inevitable. Management and Production Engineering Review, 11(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.24425/mper.2020.132942
Kuzior, A, & Lobanova, A. (2020). Tools of Information and Communication Technologies in Ecological Marketing under Conditions of Sustainable Development in Industrial Regions (Through Examples of Poland and Ukraine). Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(10), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13100238
Lendvai-Bainton, N., & Szelewa, D. (2021). Governing new authoritarianism: Populism, nationalism and radical welfare reforms in Hungary and Poland. Social Policy Administration, 55, 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12642
Mattei, G., Grossi, G., & Guthrie, A. M. J. (2021). Exploring past, present and future trends in public sector auditing research: a literature review. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(7), 94–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2020-1008
Meyer, N., & Sroka, W. (2021). A theoretical analysis of social entrepreneurship: The case of Poland and South Africa. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 8(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i1.596
Mikielewicz, D., Dąbrowski, P., Bochniak, R., & Gołąbek, A. (2020). Current Status, Barriers and Development Perspectives for Circular Bioeconomy in Polish South Baltic Area. Sustainability, 12(21), 9155. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219155
Mikołajczak, P. (2020). Social Enterprises’ Hybridity in the Concept of Institutional Logics: Evidence from Polish NGOs. Voluntas, 31, 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00195-9
Miśkiewicz, R., Rzepka, A., Borowiecki, R., & Olesińki, Z. (2021). Energy Efficiency in the Industry 4.0 Era: Attributes of Teal Organisations. Energies, 14(20), 6776. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206776
Niedziałkowski, K., & Beunen, R. (2019). The risky business of planning reform – The evolution of local spatial planning in Poland. Land Use Policy, 85, 11–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.041
Okanazu, O. O., Madu, M. A., & Igboke, S. A. (2019). A recipe for efficient and corrupt free public sector. Central European Journal of Labour Law and Personnel Management, 2 (1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.33382/cejllpm.2019.02.03
Olejniczak, T., Pikos, A., & Goto, T. (2019). In search of continuity: Theoretical and methodological insights from a case study of a Polish centennial company. Journal of Management History, 25(4), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-01-2018-0008
Pasaribu, F., Bulan, T. R. N., Muzakir, & Pratama, K. (2021). Impact of strategic leadership and organizational innovation on the strategic management: mediational role of it capability. Polish journal of management studies, 24(2), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.24.2.22
Pietruszka-Ortyl, A. (2019). The Impact of Organizational Culture for Company's Innovation Strategy. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 178–192. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.3-14
Piotrowski, G. (2020). Civil Society in Illiberal Democracy: The Case of Poland. Politologický časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science, 2, 196–214. https://doi.org/10.5817/PC20202196
Saniuk, S., Grabowska, S., & Straka, M. (2022). Identification of Social and Economic Expectations: Contextual Reasons for the Transformation Process of Industry 4.0 into the Industry 5.0 Concept. Sustainability, 14(3), 1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031391
Ślusarczyk, B., & Haque, A. (2019). Public services for business environment: challenges for implementing Industry 4.0 in Polish and Canadian logistic enterprises. Administratiesi Management Public, 33, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2019.33-04
Stroińska, E. (2020). New Public Management as a Tool for Changes in Public Administration. Journal of Intercultural Management, 12(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2020-0048
Surowiec, P., Kania-Lundholm, M., & Winiarska-Brodowska, M. (2020). Towards illiberal conditioning? New politics of media regulations in Poland (2015–2018). East European Politics, 36(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2019.1608826
Varga, M., & Buzogány, A. (2021). The Foreign Policy of Populists in Power: Contesting Liberalism in Poland and Hungary. Geopolitics, 26(5), 1442–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1734564
Witek-Crabb, A. (2019). CSR Maturity in Polish Listed Companies: A Qualitative Diagnosis Based on a Progression Model. Sustainability, 11(6), 1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061736
Zahariadis, N. (2007). The Multiple Streams Framework. In Sabatier, P. (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Second Edition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689
Ziemba, E. (2021). The Contribution of ICT Adoption by Local Governments to Sustainability – Empirical Evidence from Poland. Information Systems Management, 38(2), 116–134. https: //doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1738600
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
