The analysis of the philosophical reflection on education of the future peculiarities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.09.30.03Keywords:
philosophy of education, philosophical and educational reflections, innovativeness of education, educational strategies, educational paradigm, educational system of the future, prospects for educational developmentAbstract
Aims: The purpose of this article is to consider the peculiarities of the format and content of education in the short and long term. The philosophy of education, based on socio-cultural trends determines the vectors of innovative development of education while preserving the fundamental target elements of this sphere of social activity. In accordance with the goal, the tasks are to highlight the quantitative and qualitative indicators of educational development as well as the formation of the integrity of the educational system in the context of dynamic civilizational progress. Methodology: The research methodology forms a symbiosis of general scientific, special educational and scientific, and philosophical methods. They provide a comprehensive consideration of education in a philosophical and reflective sense. The synergistic approach gradually strengthens the position in the aspect of philosophical and scientific interpretation of the education, defining interdisciplinarity and self-organisation of structural educational components as fundamental elements of the development of this sphere. Results: The results of the study suggest building a new paradigm of education in the future that will meet the requirements of the times. Among the main elements of the educational model of the future are the following: the content elements of education – the quality, and effectiveness; dimensions of the education format – the accessibility and innovation. Scientific Novelty: The scientific novelty of the study involves the inclusion of philosophical principles in the general characteristic of the educational process in the context of globalisation, technologisation, and other trends in the civilizational development of the present and future. The introduction of synergistic guidelines for the interaction and coexistence of various systems operating in the educational system is a promising area of educational discourse since this arsenal achieves the integrity of the study of the educational environment. Conclusion: A philosophical comprehension of the prospects of education is an urgent issue of the scientific and ideological paradigm and focuses on the existential and semantic problems of the content of education and the epistemological and methodological principles of the format of education.
References
Alam, A. (2022). Positive Psychology Goes to School: Conceptualizing Students' Happiness in 21st Century Schools While 'Minding the Mind!' Are We There Yet? Evidence-Backed, School-Based Positive Psychology Interventions. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 11199. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.11199ecst
Almeida, J., Daniel, A. D., & Figueiredo, C. (2021). The future of management education: The role of entrepreneurship education and junior enterprises. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100318
Baig, M. I., Shuib, L., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2020). Big data in education: a state of the art, limitations, and future research directions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00223-0
Benade, L. (2019). Flexible Learning Spaces: Inclusive by Design? New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 54, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00127-2
Brothers, K., Rivera, S., Cadigan, R., Sharp, R., & Goldenberg, A. (2019). A Belmont Reboot: Building a Normative Foundation for Human Research in the 21st Century. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 47(1), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110519840497
Buchanan, R. (2019). Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: The Search for Principles in the World We Are Making. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.001
Bujang, S. D. A., Selamat, A., Krejcar, O., Maresova, P., & Nguyen, N. T. (2020). Digital Learning Demand for Future Education 4.0—Case Studies at Malaysia Education Institutions. Informatics, 7(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics7020013
Cerratto Pargman, T., Lindberg, Y., & Buch, A. (2023). Automation Is Coming! Exploring Future(s)-Oriented Methods in Education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00349-6
Corbett, F., & Spinello, E. (2020). Connectivism and leadership: harnessing a learning theory for the digital age to redefine leadership in the twenty-first century. Heliyon, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03250
Diachok, N., Chernukha, N., Tokaruk, L., Udovenko, I., Petrova, M., & Mateeva, M. (2020). Practical-Oriented Concept as a Principle of Professional Education of the Future Professionals. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p272
Drigas, A., & Mitsea, E. (2020). The 8 Pillars of Metacognition. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(21), 162–178. Retrieved from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/218360/
Elliott, K. C., & Rosenberg, J. (2019). Philosophical Foundations for Citizen Science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 9. http://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.155
Frank, J., & McDonough, J. (2020). Core Practices and Philosophy of Education: Balancing Effectiveness With Goodness. Teachers College Record, 122, 040302. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/016146812012200402
Hagg, G., & Gabrielsson, J. (2020). A systematic literature review of the evolution of pedagogy in entrepreneurial education research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(5), 829–861. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0272
Hughes, C. (2020). Addressing violence in education: From policy to practice. Prospects, 48, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-019-09445-1
Ismoilov, M., & Farxodjonova, N. (2020). Philosophical ideas and views of national culture in the condition of globalization. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 17(7), 14289–14295. Retrieved from: https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/5395
Kaushik, V., & Walsh, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research. Social Sciences, 8(9), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255
Kavadias, D., Nohemi Jocabeth, E. V., & Hemmerechts, K. (2020). Inequality, Civic Education and Intended Future Civic Engagement: An Examination of Research in Western Democracies. In Peterson, A., Stahl, G., Soong, H. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Citizenship and Education (pp. 583–597). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67828-3_21
Kester, K., Archer, T., & Bryant, S. (2019). Diffraction, transrational perspectives, and peace education: new possibilities. Journal of Peace Education, 16(3), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2019.1697065
Komljenovic, J. (2022). The future of value in digitalised higher education: why data privacy should not be our biggest concern. Higher Education, 83, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00639-7
Krishnamurthy, S. (2020). The future of business education: A commentary in the shadow of the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Research, 117, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.034
Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing Design Education for the 21st Century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002
Morgan, J. (2019). Will we work in twenty-first century capitalism? A critique of the fourth industrial revolution literature. Economy and Society, 48(3), 371–398. https:/ /doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1620027
Morris, T. H. (2019). Self-directed learning: A fundamental competence in a rapidly changing world. International Review of Education, 65, 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09793-2
Orakcı, Ş. (2020). The Future of Online Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. In Al-Sartawi, A., Hussainey, K., Hannoon, A., Hamdan, H. (Eds.), Global Approaches to Sustainability Through Learning and Education (pp. 28–45). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0062-0.ch003
Ossiannilsson, E. S. (2021). Resilient Sustainable Education for the Future of Education: Emerging Challenges. In Bozkurt, A. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Emerging Pedagogies for the Future of Education: Trauma-Informed, Care, and Pandemic Pedagogy (pp. 16–43). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7275-7.ch002
Pacheco, J. A. (2021). The new normal in education. Prospects, 51, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09521-x
Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637
Perrone, F., & Tucker, P. M. (2019). Shifting Profile of Leadership Preparatio Programs in the 21 Century. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(2), 253–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18799473
Rahmatullah, A. S., Mulyasa, E., Syahrani, S., Pongpalilu, F., & Putri, R. E. (2022). Digital era 4.0: The contribution to education and student psychology. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(S3), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS3.2064
Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Andrade-Vargas, L., Rivera-Rogel, D., Portuguez-Castro, M. (2021). Trends for the Future of Education Programs for Professional Development. Sustainability, 13(13), 7244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137244
Regan, P. M., & Jesse, J. (2019). Ethical challenges of edtech, big data and personalized learning: twenty-first century student sorting and tracking. Ethics and Information Technology, 21, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9492-2
Richmond, G., del Carmen Salazar, M., & Jones, N. (2019). Assessment and the Future of Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118824331
Salmon, G. (2019). May the Fourth Be with You: Creating Education 4.0. Journal of Learning for Development, 6(2), 95–115. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1222907
Stahl, B. C., Andreou, A., Brey, P., Hatzakis, T., Kirichenko, A., Macnish, K., Laulhé Shaelou, S., Patel, A., Ryan, M., & Wright, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence for human flourishing – Beyond principles for machine learning. Journal of Business Research, 124, 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.030
Stracke, C. M. (2019). Quality Frameworks and Learning Design for Open Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i2.4213
Tesar, M., Hytten, K., Kawehau Hoskins, T., Rosiek, J., Jackson, A. Y., Hand, M., Roberts, P., Opiniano, G. A., Matapo, G., Adams St. Pierre, E., Azada-Palacios, R., Kuby, C. R., Jones, A., Mazzei, L. A., Maruyama, Y., O'Donnell, A., Dixon-Román, E., Chengbing, W., Huang, Z., Chen, L., Peters, M. A., & Jackson, L. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Future of philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1234–1255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2021.1946792
Voit, E. O. (2019). Perspective: Dimensions of the scientific method. PLoS Comput Biology, 15(9), e1007279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007279
Wahono, B., & Chang, C.-Y. (2019). Assessing Teacher’s Attitude, Knowledge, and Application (AKA) on STEM: An Effort to Foster the Sustainable Development of STEM Education. Sustainability, 11, 950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040950
Zolfagharian, M., Walrave, B., Raven, R., & Romme, A. G. L. (2019). Studying transitions: Past, present, and future. Research Policy, 48(9), 103788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
