Philosophy of linguistic culture and new perspectives in modern azerbaijani linguistics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.12.30.05

Keywords:

linguistic culture, cognitive linguistics, perception, designation, symbol, philosophy of language

Abstract

The field of philosophy of language is full of controversy. It is worth noting that the philosophy of language should not be confused with the philosophy of linguistics, as it is nothing more than its epistemology. The purpose of this paper is to provide a more general view of the language and culture of Azerbaijan with the use of the epistemological approach. As a tool for philosophical reflection methods including critical analysis of language and new trends in linguistics were used. In addition, such scientific methods as: deductive method, analysis, synthesis, modelling were involved. The literature search was conducted in several databases, including Google Scholar, Scopus search, and Web of Science. The specific used keywords were philosophy of language, linguistic culture, concept, cognitive linguistics, vocabulary, and definitions. The timeframe of the articles went beyond 2018-2021 and include only the latest data. The results of the work showed that the structure of the Azerbaijani language, the worldview imposed by the culture, the properties of the language, especially its extraordinary flexibility, cannot remain outside of philosophical argumentation. The vocabulary of the Azerbaijani language is traditionally studied within the framework of a text, as well as in the process of learning language and speech rules. At the stage of higher education, students are provided with detailed information about lexical-grammatical, structural-semantic, and, less often, etymological features of the vocabulary. At the same time, students of higher education cover this process in a somewhat broader direction. A new powerful branch of lexicology that has entered the scientific world of Azerbaijani linguistics is cognitive lexicology. The article describes new linguistic possibilities of studying the vocabulary of the modern Azerbaijani language in the semantic-cognitive and linguistic-cultural aspects, a number of unique national and cultural features characteristic of words and phrases of the conceptual space, describes the philosophical regularities of verbalisation, how many associative images are modelled in Azerbaijanis worldview. The conclusions determine that the concept of culture is expressed in words, fragments that reflect the linguistic landscape of the world. In research, the words and phrases are studied as a cognitive procedure.

References

Amirshakhova, S. (2020). About some changes in the material culture of the modern urban population of Azerbaijan. https://doi.org/10.15421/172058

Azeri, S. (2019). Vygotsky and Ilyenkov on Language, the “Ideal” and the Constitution of Consciousness. Socialism and Democracy, 33(3), 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2020.1768793

Baggini, J., & Fosl, P. S. (2020). The philosopher's toolkit: a compendium of philosophical concepts and methods. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/exportProduct/pdf/9781119103219

Beaver, D., & Stanley, J. (2019). Toward a non-ideal philosophy of language. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 39(2), 501-545. https://doi.org/10.5840/gfpj201839224

Bietti, E. (2020, January). From ethics washing to ethics bashing: a view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 210-219). https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372860

Bourget, D., & Chalmers, D. J. (2021). Philosophers on philosophy: The 2020 philpapers survey. Unpublished manuscript]. https://philpapers. org/rec/BOUPOP-3. www.philosophersimprint.org/000000/

Caton, J. N. (2020). Using linguistic corpora as a philosophical tool. Metaphilosophy, 51(1), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12405

Dessiatnitchenko, P. (2022). The Pearl of Muğam Philosophy: Qəzəl Poetry and Musical Hermeneutics in Independent Azerbaijan. Ethnomusicology, 66(1), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.5406/21567417.66.1.06

Dingemanse, M., Perlman, M., & Perniss, P. (2020). Construals of iconicity: experimental approaches to form–meaning resemblances in language. Language and cognition, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.48

Divjak, D., †,, Milin, P., †, & Medimorec, S. (2020). Construal in language: A visual-world approach to the effects of linguistic alternations on event perception and conception. Cognitive Linguistics, 31(1), 37-72. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0103

Doszhan, G., & Gauriyeva, G. (2019). Problems of vitality of the Turkic languages in the age of globalisation. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(5), 92-98. www.prosoc.eu

Emmott, C. (2020). 'Split selves' in fiction and in medical'life stories': cognitive linguistic theory and narrative practice. In The Language and Literature Reader (pp. 244-254). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060789-27

Feith, M. (2019). Philosophy Embedded in Space. African American Review, 52(1), 87-100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26795171

Gizi, A. G. A. (2019). AZERBAIJANI LITERARY LANGUAGE OF THE 17th CENTURY: THE SOCIO-POLITICAL CONTENT AND LANGUAGE OF THE ERA. PONTE International Scientific Researchs Journal, 75(1). http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/ged/index

Glazebrook, T. (2020). Heidegger's philosophy of science. Fordham University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823295838

Gobbo, F., & Russo, F. (2020). Epistemic diversity and the question of Lingua Franca in science and philosophy. Foundations of Science, 25(1), 185-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9950-2.

Godart-Wendling, B. (2020). History of Analytic Philosophy of Language. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.446

Gordon, L. (2020). Fanon and the crisis of European man: An essay on philosophy and the human sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003061533

Grimaldi, W. M. (2020). Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle’s Rhetoric. In Landmark Essays (pp. 15-31). Routledge. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3295083

Guliyeva, K. Our Philosophy of National Intercultural Dialogue From the Ideology of Azerbaijanism to Multiculturalism. doi: 10.17265/1537-1514/2021.02.003

Gulshan, A. K. (2019). HİSTORY OF TURKİSH SUFISM. American Scientific Journal, (26-1), 4-7. https://www.academia.edu/71602895/Turkish_sufism

Innis, R. E. (2020). Between philosophy and cultural psychology. Switzerland: Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-58190-9

Karimzad, F. (2021). Multilingualism, chronotopes, and resolutions: Toward an analysis of the total sociolinguistic fact. Applied Linguistics, 42(5), 848-877. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa053

Lakoff, G. (2019). Ten lectures on cognitive linguistics. Brill. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3885532.v1

Leigh, R. (2020). Hasidic Thought and Tsimtsum’s Linguistic Turn. Tsimtsum and Modernity: Lurianic Heritage in Modern Philosophy and Theology, 16, 83. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110684353

Mammedzadeh, I. (2019). Philosophy of the Approach to the Interaction of Cultures. Проблеми на постмодерността, 9(3), 349-361. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=817611

Masolo, D. A. (2019). African philosophy in search of identity. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474470773

Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020). From what to how: an initial review of publicly available AI ethics tools, methods and research to translate principles into practices. Science and engineering ethics, 26(4), 2141-2168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.132.3429.741

Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A systemic philosophical analysis of the contemporary society and the human: new potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235

Nicolai, C., & Rossi, L. (2018). Principles for object-linguistic consequence: From logical to irreflexive. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 47, 549-577. https:/ /link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10992-017-9438-x

O’Halloran, K. (2019). Critical discourse analysis and language cognition. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474471411

Odacıoğlu, M. C. (2019). The role of translation studies and translation theory in the far east. http://hdl.handle.net/11772/2798

Orujov, A. A. (2021). Approaches of Azerbaijani researchers to the concept of ideology and national ideology. In Science, Education and Innovations in the Context of Modern Problems Conference (Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 146-153). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6287217

Politi, V. (2020). Taxonomies, Networks, and Lexicons: A Study of Kuhn’s Post-‘Linguistic Turn’Philosophy. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 33(2), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2020.1865784

Romele, A. (2019). Digital hermeneutics: philosophical investigations in new media and technologies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429331893

Shytyk, L., & Akimova, A. (2020). Ways of transferring the internal speech of characters: Psycholinguistic projection. Psycholinguistics, 27(2), 361-384. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-27-2-361-384

Suleiman, Y. (2019). Arabic language and national identity: a study in ideology. Edinburgh University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctvxcrx0x

Tesar, M. (2021). Philosophy as a Method”: Tracing the Histories of Intersections of “Philosophy,”“Methodology,” and “Education. Qualitative inquiry, 27(5), 544-553. doi.org/10.1177/1077800420934144

Vendler, Z. (2019). Linguistics in philosophy. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501743726

Winters, M. E., & Nathan, G. S. (2020). Cognitive linguistics for linguists. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2020.10

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Jalilbayli, O. B. (2022). Philosophy of linguistic culture and new perspectives in modern azerbaijani linguistics. Futurity Philosophy, 1(4), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.12.30.05